I spent a lot of effort (and grew few more grey hairs) trying to avoid creation of the fork (while wanting to get some work actually done), but failed at that :( You can find context in this /r/emulation thread.Īt the moment chances of merging the projects are close to 0, but maybe in few dosbox-staging releases, when everything will cool-down, we could pick up the topic again. But of course it would be even better if you could the same change in the original project instead of starting a new one.I agree - the best outcome would be if all the improvements landed upstream and fork could be avoided. Quoting: what are the chances of eventually merging your changes to the original dosbox? Or merging those two projects? Is dosbox development completely dead - so dead, that it can't be even revived? Can you share some background regarding this? I'm extremely happy for your project, because I long felt that dosbox was missing user friendly features (like window resizing). dosbox-staging is much bigger with many more contributors at this point. I plan to bring those two projects closer, but very likely they will stay as 2 projects (we'll see). Quoting: Purple Library GuyI was wondering, and then seeing you here clearly involved gives me a hint that the answer is fairly positive-so, what's the relationship between this and Boxtron?They are really close - dosbox-staging started when I found bugs in DOSBox, that I couldn't work around in Boxtron. See more about dosbox-staging on the official site and GitHub.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |